js1000

they voted for him 3 times, people protested against his war, he didn't end it so they elected him again and again with a huge majority, suddenly he's the most hated man in britain. when i asked colleagues who voted for him after the invasion why - because he's not a tory. genius. besides they're all war mongers, the paedophilia in parliament is so rife that only the most naive can't see the efforts they're going to in order to cover it up and still the 'plebs' vote. no wonder they have complete disdain for working people, we deserve it. this happens every time, and every time people think its going to be different this time, like the battered wife who goes back and wonders why she's been beaten again 'he said he wouldn't hit me again' and like i said above, they still reelected him, not once but TWICE more. why? i tell you the reason, because he deregulated the banks, they were giving money to everyone, we were all well off with cheap mortgages and rising house prices so we didn't give a F*** about a few dead muslims, we were all rich fat and content, then he stepped down to allow gordon brown to take the flak for the crash he knew was coming, people started to become poor again and now people vent their bile at Blair and are suddenly outraged about being lied to over the war. Meanwhile cameron is doing his best to delay chilcott for the benefit of an 'opposition' PM.

well if you're happy to vote for evil then go right ahead. count me out but i will say this, if the party you vote for wins and decides to bomb a load of people somewhere then you got blood on your hands. i've never understood this 'lesser of 2 evils' argument @KORO it was tony blair (Labour) who was pushing for turkey to join the EU, it was only Germany and a few other european nations strong opposition to this that prevented it. You know the same blair that called greek cypriots a 'bunch of used car salesmen' after they rejected the annan plan in 2004, and he was very quick to point out that the turkish cypriots had accepted it and wanted peace and to live together. Proper labour values those, pro immigration and staunch anti racists but find it acceptable to call a nation they don't like a bunch of second had car salesmen and loons, nutcases and extremists to those that don't agree with them. so go ahead guys vote labour 'the lesser of 2 evils'

quite correct, whether you vote or not you'll get cameron or miliband both warmongers, both pro EU, both pro uncontrolled immigration, both pro banker, both allow their corporate chums to not pay corporation tax(amazon, google, starbucks, pfizer, npower, vodafone etc etc) both are pro green taxes/levies to combat so called man made global warming(lining the pockets of their chums in the energy sector and handing grants to wind farms that don't work properly) both have done their best to shield all the paedophilia in parliament, and cameron has done his best to delay the chilcott inquiry, imagine that, a tory prime minister blocking/delaying an inquiry that would devastate the labour party, shielding a former labour PM, you'd think he'd want that out to make his 'opponents' look bad. they allow the country to fill up with immigrants thus giving their corporate chums infinite access to cheap labour, those that try and point that out are instantly branded as 'racist' just look at the treatment they give UKIP, the tories and the labour party have labelled them 'fruit loons' and 'closet racists' and 'nutcases' their arrogance is astounding, if you disagree with the status quo thats how you're labelled. Ed Miliband recently blamed the death of immigrants trying to flee Libya for europe on Camerons actions in Libya, however at the time of our intervention there when we bombed the s%$#! out of them Miliband backed the action. before the last election Cameron promised to give us a referendum on the UK remaining in the EU, he didn't deliver but is now promising the same if he's elected. they are not contractually obliged to carry out whats in their manifesto's, they face zero consequences when they do the opposite, but as the british people are thick enough to keep voting for them, then you can't really blame the politicians for taking the piss, fiddling their expenses, employing their spouses/children, and in the case of jack straw taking money from a furniture company which amazingly got a contract to supply government with furniture, and now that MR straw is leaving politics guess where he's going to work as a consultant, correct the same furniture firm - who would of thought. happy voting, count me out.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3046653/Horror-trapped-migrants-final-moments-300-terrified-people-locked-ship-s-hold-capsized-way-Europe-leaving-900-dead.html now more have died attempting to come into Rhodes. IMMIGRATION GUMBALLS

Ethiopia: who needs roundabouts and traffic lights :D

makes no difference who's in power, this has been going on for years SYRIZA has been in power a few months, the post above sums up the real agenda behind it. large corporations benefit greatly, they in turn lobby politicians/political parties, who are then keen to label those that object to this as racist in order to shut down the debate. which is why the media and the 3 main parties in the UK are constantly attacking UKIP. @che that video you posted finishes with 'act now before its too late' what do they expect people to do? have loads of offspring and F*** their standard of living? this happens because those in power allow(encourage) it to happen. i really can't argue with the above full article here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage/11548171/Nigel-Farage-David-Cameron-directly-caused-Libyan-migrant-crisis.html

subsidies come with strings attached, these strings are EU legislations and codes that create dependancy, once you create dependancy the next subsidies come with more strings, policies that are unpopular with people that the government must spin and sell to the public as a good thing, the country now becomes dependent on these subsidies and those handing out those subsidies get to dictate policy in a once sovereign nation, meanwhile the media in countries that are net contributors like UK, germany and finland continually report that their tax money is being spent building railways and highways in greece while the greek people do no work retire at 55 and are a bunch of tax dodgers, which is why anti eu politicians in richer nations are screaming bloody murder, meanwhile the EU demand austerity higher taxes in greece, the raising of the retirement age, cuts in public spending and wage cuts resulting in greeks in their own country no longer able to pay their mortgages and rent and living on the streets. nothing can change until greece leaves the euro and EU and is able to make its own decision regarding who they want to have closer ties with. the EU is a busted flush, money just disappears from this giant organisation completely unaccounted for which is why the EU has NEVER had its accounts signed off by auditors.

there's no such thing as free money, hence the reason we're in so much 'debt' are you suggesting without EU help we wouldn't have bridges and highways? the EU has never had its accounts signed off by auditors, its as bent and corrupt as the pro EU leaders we've had leading greece over the last few decades. its driven up prices in eastern europe and flooded western europe with cheap labour driving down wages. no one said anything about being a superpower but that doesn't mean we can't come out of the EU and decide who we choose to trade with, we cannot create jobs you say but at present the troika demand we CUT jobs and services under their austerity measures. and as irlandos has so eloquently put it, its EU laws/rules etc that have made countries dependent on one another, they don't want self sufficiency just dependance, so they can go on dictating how you run your own country. the irish the portuguese the italians the spanish and cypriots are the most obvious examples of people continually protesting against the EU. the leadership in hungary and czech republic have also been fairly outspoken against the EUs stance on the russia ukraine conflict. i'm not sure anyone's benefited from the EU or from the US. look at how most of the world feel about the US. no, they are blaming the banking racket not the capitalists, in a capitalist system failed businesses(banks) do not get bailed out using public funds, which puts governments in debt who in turn look to fleece working people through higher taxes and austerity in order to pay back what has become a national debt. interesting, how many ukranians voted for their current leader?? the west didn't like the democratically elected leader of ukraine so we imposed our own man. meddling in the affairs of yet another country like the US have done all over latin america. look how that's turned out high inflation in ukraine a currency thats lost a lot of its value and poreshenko going cap in hand for loans. yet we want to question the authenticity of the crimean vote because it didn't go our way.

well its worked in your case lazarus, the anti russian western media sensationalism has made you believe that russia could possibly annex a greek island if greece should allow them to have a base on one. fair point but if greece has had corrupt politicians for the last 30-40 years, politicians who are incompetent and have put their country in the mess its in then why would you expect greeks to elect the same rubbish again, SYRIZA in their eyes was their only hope, did you expect people to vote for the same establishment pro EU parties that have failed them for the last few decades?? they've had enough, but if they don't leave the euro and the EU they will always be dictated to and be indebted to the EU. i thought the people of crimea unanimously voted to become part of russia, like the people of montenegro did when they wanted independence. the serbs in kosovo didn't have that luxury though, nor did the inhabitants of diego garcia but us in the west pick and choose what we decide should be called annexation based on what suits us at the time. by the way i'm very pro freedom of speech but if this retired army general had said this about jews or africans and not russians, what consequences would he face??

'annexed' something that was historically theirs without a shot being fired, when the west bombed serbia for 78 days(hitting the chinese embassy, schools and hospitals in the process) in order to secure an independent kosovo no one in the west mentioned the term 'annexed' by the way its the germans and the EU that have mooted the idea of taking a greek island as debt repayment. and what have the EU done for greece ? are they looking out for greece ?? or demanding austerity, impoverishing our people and dictating when people should retire and what services should be cut and forcing us to charge our own people obscene property taxes in order to pay a debt that the those being asked to pay(the people) did not benefit from the loans. and what do other EU citizens think of us ?? they think of greeks as lazy tax dodging work shy and incompetent because thats the narrative they've been fed by the western media.

to be fair to us though we were being managed by a complete retard at the time.

still can't understand why you continually make excuses for this clown, a disaster from start to finish, bottom line is players didn't want to play for him. would you seriously have kept him on as manager if it was your decision?? i felt sorry for salpi that day, every time the ball touched him it went off, not a captains performance.

whilst i agree with your point about kats, i think markarian did miles better than ranieri, the players simply didn't want to play for that clown which was evidenced by them making northern ireland look world class and losing at home to the faroes. A decent striker and we would have beaten hungary, greece passed better and played with more energy than they have in a long time.

his strike rate at international level is quite good, with samaras and mitroglou out gekas for me was a no brainer, athanasiadis is not international quality, worth a place in the squad but not a starter.

samaras and mitroglou were both out injured, we are really short up front athanasiadis is not international quality - not his fault he tries his best but lacks quality - karelis isn't even good enough for PAO which is why i would have taken gekas. good performance though good effort they wanted to play for the new coach shame ranieri has ruined any chance we had of qualification. Karnezis - 6. dependable couple of good saves Torosidis - 7 captains performance good crosses and was a threat going forward Papastathopoulos - 7. dependable and reliable as ever, we're lucky to have him Manolas - 6. ok, caught flat footed a couple of times though. Stafylidis - 7. only his 3rd game for the NT, good crosses great going forward looks comfortable at this level. Samaris - 6. made a few interceptions, didn't really offer much going forward. Papadopoulos - 6. did well considering he was played out of position and has been out for ages. Fetfatzidis - 7. caused the hungarians panic but lacked end product which is unsurprising as he hasn't played for ages. reminds me of raheem sterling. Kone - 5. the quality he has he should have done better. fluffed 2 headers. Christodoulopoulos - 5. just runs with his head down doesn't look up and keeps the ball for too long. Athanasiadis - 5. tries hard, held the ball up well but lacks quality, he was never going to score. 11 caps 0 goals so far. Fortounis - neat and tidy player, needs a run in the Olympiakos side to get match fit. Gianniotas - too lightweight Katsouranis - waste of a substitution, tachtsidis was the man we needed to try and open up the hungarians, if we were leading and needed a man to do a bit of time wasting then he would have been worth bringing on, but not when we're chasing a goal. on the whole i'm very optimistic with markarian, the players looked hungry and wanted to play for him, we just need some strikers and we'll be a very good side.

the squad for sundays match in budapest is as follows. O Karnezis(Udinese) S Kapino(Mainz) M Vellidis(Pas Giannina) K Stafylidis(Fulham) S Papastathopoulos(Borussia Dortmund) V Torosidis K Manolas(both Roma) K Papadopoulos(Bayer Leverkusen) L Vyntra(Levante) D Siovas(Olympiakos) M Bakakis(AEK Athens) V Moras(Verona) K Katsouranis(Atromtos) A Samaris(Benfica) P Tachtsidis L Christodoulopoulos(both Verona) P Kone(Udinese) G Fetfatzidis(Chievo) K Fortounis(Olympiakos) T Lagos(Panathinaikos) G Gianniotas(Asteras Tripolis) S Athanasiadis(PAOK) N Karelis(Panathinaikos) A Giannou(Panionios) baffled by the inclusion of katsouranis, the rest of the squad looks ok but we're very light up front, with mitroglou and samaras out injured surely gekas should have been considered. well good luck to markarian but i'm not sure where the goals will come from.

gone on loan to italian side Sassuolo Calcio

samaras has joined saudi arabian club Al Hilal for the next 3 years. His newly contract will bring in a total of $14m ($3,5m the first year, then $4,5m and finally $6m) paid by the club?s multimillionaire owner Abdulrahman bin Musa?ad.

avraam's gone to china :tup: , Chinese side Sanghai Greenland paid ?285.000 to cancel his contract with his previous club Trabzonspor. The former Aris Thessaloniki and Olympiakos defender will become the first Greek to play in China.

he was managing georgia until very recently. dusan bajevic also knows greek football, there are so many better options than trapetoni. also his sacking from olympiakos was scandalous, he never even lost a match with olympiakos.

well ranieri's been sacked and earned himself a lovely pay off, something he has a history of doing. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2705722/Claudio-Ranieri-earned-10m-Greece-appointed-ex-Chelsea-boss.html seems trappetoni is set to replace him. from one overpriced useless italian clown to another. the man for the job should be temuri ketsbaia he'll come cheap is fluent in greek and has a knowledge of greek football. its back to the dark ages for greek football and EPO are responsible for hiring a buffoon and then replacing him with another.

trouble is under ranieri every team is different, which team has to prove it can win?? next time we'll have a completely different team again.

2 or 3 additions to replace retired or past it players is what was needed what we got is disgraceful, 40 freakin players called up so far, bakakis and tasoulis have been called up bakakis plays in the greek second division for AEK, but the point is these players are not 18 they're 23, karabelas is a decent player but are we seriously gonna give a 29 year old his first cap at the expense of stafylidis the only player to emerge with and credit from the northern ireland game and is 20 with 2 caps to his name. mavrias still hasn't played a single minute for sunderland this season and is back in the squad, no wonder the english laugh at us. its a squad of novices which is why the omissions of samaras and mitroglou are completely baffling. the senior players don't want to play for this clown, the post match interview with torosidis after we were destroyed by northern ireland was in my opinion very telling. how can you put this thing together when ranieri is calling up anyone and everyone and leaving out players that have been there and done it for us, players that young inexperienced newcomers look up to. what can bakakis tasoulis mavrias mantalos and dinas offer this squad?? karelis is not international class either and the jury's still out on athanasiadis who looks decent but at almost 26 he should be better than he is, kolovos is the only new call up that in my opinion may be worth a look. we should still beat the faroe's but ranieri has destroyed us.

what do you expect when we're managed by a complete buffoon. he's called up about 40 players since he took over. zero continuity cohesion or consistency. completely gutted by what i'm seeing, i'd rather we lost just to get rid of this clown but thats not possible at home to the faroes. don't think i'll even bother watching, i'm too depressed.

well gekas has 10 goals in 10 games in turkey, cannot see any reason to leave him out, is mitroglou out for him or is mitroglou out for karelis and athanasiadis, or is the need to bring in mavrias and only 3 strikers instead of 4 the reason mitroglou is out. joke!