Leaderboard

Emperor you’re really gonna compare Pantelidis to what Oenning has done? Does constancy mean anything to you? Who was the last Aris coach to bring consistent results and ensure you’re always a hard team to beat? You gotta go a long way back. You don’t have depth in your squad so the coach has to do with what he has, boost your defense and you go even further.

I've answered many times, he took a crap roster and worked wonders!! If you give a chef cow dung he might be able to spice it up with basil and oregano but it's still manure at the end of the day. He had us with one foot in the final, he got us to the playoffs with a roster of 13 to 14 players and not because he destroyed them but because they weren't good enough. As fans we tend to overvalue our players, if you really look at the difference between the two squads there is nothing to complain about. I applaud him and am glad that he is back.

-Κατέστρεψε Μαρτίνεζ -Κατέστρεψε Σουντγκρεν -Κατέστρεψε Ντιγκινι και έφαγε humble pie γιατί του βγαζει γκολ κάθε φορά που μπαινει!!! -Αναγκάστηκε να προωθήσει Μαντσίνι και τρώει πάλι humble pie γιατί είναι 10 φορές καλύτερος από αυτόν που βγαινει -Εβαλε Σάσα στα μπακ έχασε το κέντρο -Οταν η ΑΕΚ είχε 3 γομάρια εκει, εμείς με 2 ξεφουσκωσαμε -Κρατησε Γκάμα που δεν υπήρχε μέσα στο γηπεδο -Ξαναεπέμεινε στα ψοφια άλογα Λάρσον και Ιντεγε, τον εξέθεσαν ΠΑΛΙ -Ξεθέωσε την ομαδα O άνθρωπος πρέπει να φύγει...

What did he accomplish? Αν δε κοιμόταν ο Θεός θα χάναμε 5-1 στην Αθήνα και 1-4 εδώ. Απλά ο θεός ξύπνησε στο 95.... Ο τύπος είναι fluke....

All German officiating crew for this one, with the scared shitless Tzilos as the 4th official. As we witnessed yesterday the 4th official can directly influence the result of a game.

Pound for pound Oenning was coach of the year in the SL for taking this roster as far as he did!! As for the yesterday's game everything he did was correct, we just got beat by a better team. I believe two or three of their players make more than the entire Aris roster. I've been complaining about Ideye myself but yesterday he was very important giving the team "anases" as they say by being awarded plenty of fouls and holding the ball with his ability to hold off defenders because he is strong "gia na anevi i omada". Starting the Swede over Mancini was also smart because the youngster wouldn't have been as effective against AEK early on while their players were still fresh. He threw him in at the right time and it showed. I keep hearing about Martinez but Oenning is the third coach to not give him many minutes, not the first. Every player that came in played hard there was zero evidence of discontent. What this man has been able to accomplish with a depleted roster being handcuffed with ban's, unpaid players lousy summer transactions can only be characterized as remarkable. Once again pound for pound coach of the year.

Demilitarization is a must. In keeping with the money theme, though - police departments generally get these for free, as the military decommissions equipment. I'm sure there's some budget-related accounting chicanery that takes place to allow both sides to realize additional benefits from this arrangement, as well: Moundsville is in West Virginia (one of the poorest states in the union), and has a population less than 10,000. "“We could use it for various things,” Mitchell said. He said the department can use it as a “tactical resource vehicle” for various scenarios." https://www.theintelligencer.net/news/top-headlines/2020/06/moundsville-police-department-unveils-tactical-resource-vehicle/ Also, a good article about what I think is a much bigger problem - the power of police unions have over, well, everything. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/melissasegura/police-unions-history-minneapolis-reform-george-floyd

Everyone is pushing their own truth, you cant claim the moral high ground by being a bully, tone it down and stick to the issues don't need to call people out. RESPECT each other please and each others right to disagree or have an opinion that you do not agree with. Otherwise the flow of conversation will degenerate. Have you seen some of the equipment that police departments have in the USA? Have a quick look and you will get the answer to this question file. As for the radical left, it did exist at one time, maybe in the 60s or 70s where left wing organizations actually comitted acts of terror and such. Today there is no radical left, it is a made up fantasy used to excuse and legitimize the neo nazis (alt right). She does not have enough "likeability" to win.

Dems spend a lot of money in places like Texas, which is trending blue as the Hispanic population grows. The bigger issue (from their perspective) is that much of the deep-red states (mostly in the South) have a very well-organized Republican base. I think I mentioned a few pages back that the Republicans have been very good at organizing a few intense interest groups into a coalition that will move in lockstep; these groups are particularly well-represented in the traditionally red states. Even in states like Georgia, where there are broad swaths of the state that are predominantly black, the minority population is still deeply a minority - wiki tells me that blacks make up only 27% of Georgia, while its capital (Atlanta) is 51% black. I think that media tends to forget that all because you see one concentration of one group, doesn't mean that they are actually the largest group. There is a possible realignment actually happening now anyway, wherein the southwest (Arizona, New Mexico, Texas) may be trending more liberal as the Hispanic populations both grow and exercise the vote. Meanwhile, the midwest and great lakes regions (which used to be full of swing states due to their large "blue collar" populations) seem to be trending more conservative outside of the bigger cities. There is a very real belief that the Democrats have abandoned them as their traditional manufacturing and agricultural industries have been hit by global markets falling grain prices. The Republicans do listen (though I'm sure liberals would tell you the conservatives are just taking advantage of the rubes, which is itself a hilarious way to look at it IMO). This ultimately may be an example of the right-wing identity politics tantra might be alluding to. Ultimately it is difficult to allocate money to all states because money is a finite resource. Believe it or not, these parties do not have billions of dollars in reserve, so they need to target carefully for maximum effect. It is often easier to cede control of a place like Arkansas, if they think they have a better chance to take control of Pennsylvania with those same funds. Of course that's on a national, party-wide level - there are plenty of locally based candidates who will gladly take and spend all of your money regardless of which locality you look at. Not sure what you mean by Nancy Pelosi going up against Trump? Like, in which way? Oh and for those of you who are questioning the existence of radical leftist candidates - the tone of your question implies that you don't believe they exist, so I'm not sure what the point of trying to convince you of that would be? Like we get it, most of the western world is more liberal than the United States. What's your point?

Tantra who do you see as the radical left in the US? And what actions and outcome(s) do you refer to? I am just trying to see what you mean, because I hear talk of a radical left, but I never know who the radical lefties are, can you kindly shed some light file?