Ti 3-5-2 kai 4-3-3 kai 4-4-2 kai kai kai... When a cross comes in and everybody is ball watching (the 2nd goal) or your keeper hands them a goal on a platter (the 3rd goal) of what relevance is the system ?
At some point, every man on the pitch just has to do their part, and when you play teams stronger than you, even more so. Everything has to go right to even have a chance.
If anything, the 3-5-2 in terms of limiting the opposition chances worked! Trela e ? I must be crazy. And yet, how many clear cut chances did Schalke have ? Only 1 (the 2nd goal). The 1st goal and 3rd goal were nothing goals. Just presents from Glykos (who to be fair has been good overall this season). 3-5-2 just means you're giving up space on the flanks to pack players into the middle. I get it, not that I necessarily agree with it. It's hard to say really. If we played a normal 4-2-3-1 for all we knows Schalke would've sliced us down the middle half a dozen times and that's why Ivic packed the middle of the pitch.
The problem though with the system we played was that we were always hoping for some sort of miracle up front. Your two up front have to be really good to apply pressure. Mystakidis did his job. Klaus what can I say. He tried but it's just not enough. Seriously, if you're Schalke are you going to be worried about a front two of these two players ?
On a side note, Canas would've been invaluable this game.