Jump to content
Phantis Forums

JimAdams

Members
  • Content Count

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

JimAdams last won the day on September 27 2016

JimAdams had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

69 Neutral

About JimAdams

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Houston, Texas

Recent Profile Visitors

4,431 profile views
  1. If you don't know by now that they are referencing Trump suntan color then why bother posting at all. If you do know, stop wasting everybody's time with your hogwash posting.
  2. Black Lives Matter activists have released a 10 point plan to address abuses by US police forces. Ending "broken windows" policing, which aggressively polices minor crimes in an attempt to stop larger ones using community oversight for misconduct rather than having police decide what consequences officers face making standards for reporting police use of deadly force independently investigating and prosecuting police misconduct having the racial makeup of police departments reflect the communities they serve requiring officers to wear body cameras prov
  3. Yes, referring to people of Asian descent (Japanese) and 'nip' is derogatory and is intended to diminish the people it is directed towards. As far as I know, the Japanese still refer to their country as Nippon, as that is the name of the place in Japanese, but call themselves Nihon-jin. An intentionally dismissive truncation of a legitimate word does not make using it "OK" . With a little curiosity you can look it up on Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nip The same stands for terms used to refer to other people of different skin color or ethnic descent. Ignorance is no ex
  4. Is that because you don't have any accurate data? Even so with nothing to back up your racist positioning you still make a racists statement. Are we to take you on your word? Just like Trump's "believe me . my body parts are not tiny." This bullshit and misinformation has been going on since forever. “Whites could not countenance the idea of a white woman desiring sex with a Negro, thus any physical relationship between a white woman and a black man had, by definition, to be an unwanted assault,” writes historian Philip Dray, describing Wells-Barnett’s argument in his book At the Ha
  5. That's all you talk about. Your entire life consts of digging out articles where black (or colored, or immigrants) people inflict harm on white folks. THe reverse type of crime doesn't even cross your radar. Just stand up and say : I'm a proud racist. I'm sure a bunch of guys in here will friend you on Facebook.
  6. You're so freakin' predictable! All the stuff that you post are black on white crimes. Big deal. Black on white, white on black... These crimes happen all the time. So do brown on black, black on brown. It's a diverse society where people of a different race interacted with others. But no - For you any such crime is eviodence that the black (or brown or substitute any color that you like) race is placed on this earth to commit crimes. DELETED>.>>>> I really don't understand how these forums allow for such blatant racism in plain view. Sure I'll get another warning by t
  7. The reality is that you don't talk about race and the racial divide in the US. You bash black people and immigrants all those with a different color of skin. An equal opportunity discriminator. And that's post after post, after post, after post. Anything they do or say, they are always on the wrong side of things. It's always their fault, they are the ones to blame for everything. They are the liars the `low lives` that provide support for all your arguments. If that ain't white race supremacy, then maybe Steve Bannon can tell us what it is. I think there is a single word that actually
  8. To those that keep missing the point. The US Constitution supports people having a choice to choose their religion or sexuality. There's nothing about how religions run their business unless they infringe upon the rights or others. Nothing about whether a person's sexuality is good or bad. It's not the USA's business what Muslims in Yemen do. They can disagree or not support their Human Rights record - according to international standards - but other than that, not their business. In the USA that I have known, people can agree or disagree with somebody else's lifestyle. But they can't vio
  9. Your words. I guess he's your compatriot from down under, so it's cool for him to jump in I call the beast by its name: 666
  10. Really? In a forum that ''cherishes' opinions, tolerates alt-facts, I get a warning because I think that people that voted for Trump screwed up this country? You gotta be kidding me! Here we are talking about a constitutional crisis in the US of A, and I get warned because I chastise those that brought Trump into power? You skillfully brush off my question "You let the alt-right people post fake facts call us "attention whores" and "libturds"? Sorry buddy. What or who are you afraid off? Poor old me? I don't have any power. I just try to stand up to racists and bigots. It seems lik
  11. So I get a warning for point out alt-facts? When @gk2033 call those who complain "attention whores" that's just dandy? Somehow I sense double standards in here. Is it that the squeaking wheel gets the grease? I can squeak real good. You let the alt-right people post fake facts call us "attention whores" and "libturds"? I get a warning for saying "who the F*** is most Americans" when somebody clearly misrepresents the facts? Is the warning because I called aek66 'deplorable'? Or because I think that people with his political orientation have F***ed up the USA?
  12. Who is 'most Americans'? You and your dog? Last I checked Trump lost the popular vote, and those that voted for Trump live in the middle of nowhere. The people that you see protesting is who the US is about.
  13. What does this have to do with anything? We live in the United States of America. Our values have always been fighting for human rights and freedoms. I know you won't like this but it's people like you that F***ed up this country! What's the word? Ah, yes. Deplorables. For those unsure about the word, Merriam-Webster defines deplorable in the following way: “Very bad in a way that causes shock, fear, or disgust: deserving to be deplored” and “deserving censure or contempt.” Synonyms for the word deplorable are: disgraceful, shameful, dishonorable, unworthy, inexcusable, unpardonable, unfo
×
×
  • Create New...