Jump to content
Phantis Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Bashibozuk

Trump Is Not the Problem, the DNC is

Recommended Posts

Trump is not the problem; the DNC (i.e. the Democratic National Committee) is.

When Carter (screwed by OPEC, unpopular thanks to OPEC, and sabotaged by his own party) was defeated in 1978, the Democratic National Committee decided that the plebe that voted Democratic could not be trusted to choose electable candidates. In the future the DNC would choose its own super-delegates who would enable the choice of good candidates.

In 2016 those who read newspapers read that:

  1. The super-delegates were 15% of the total. Therefore, if the elected delegates were Sanders 49% and Clinton 36% of the total, Mrs Clinton would have been the Democratic candidate.

  2. At the New Hampshire’s primary Sanders received 60.4% of the poll vote and Mrs Clinton 38%, of the poll vote. Sanders had 15 voted delegates; Mrs Clinton had 9 elected delegates and 6 superdelegates. Is that possible that the the D in DNC stands for Double-dealing?

  3. On October 30, 2016, the DNC interim chair Donna Brazile was fired from her position as a political commentator at CNN over e-mail leaks suggesting she had improperly supplied Hillary Clinton’s campaign with advance knowledge of debate-questions.

  1. Let us move beyond the lady Macbeth aspects of the DNC. How idiotic must one be in order to manage to lose an election against a pathetic bimbo? This demands great talent. Examples:

α) Trump brags that he will bring the factories back to the USA; the DP claims that the new factories will use robots and the unemployed will remain unemployed.

β) The DP is all for clean energy. What about the coal-miners in WV? Under the DP plan they will live longer because of cancer avoidance. Moreover, since they will have less money, their life-span will feel even longer.

γ) In the US the members of every group live, on the average, longer than the previous generation. With one exception; low-class whites. To the best of my limited knowledge, the DP has no plan for them.

My impression is that Trump is not the problem. The doctor Frankenstein that created him is.

 

Edited by Bashibozuk
Needed edit/correct the title
  • Like it 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr Frankenstein indeed.

Trump took everyone by surprise.  Early in the GOP nomination process, when there were still a dozen or so candidates, the sneering  and contempt towards Trump was something to behold.  Fair enough, the man is an imbecile and who didn’t mock him.

But by the time he’d won the candidacy, Clinton should’ve been very afraid.  Instead she felt safe because Oprah was on her side.  With her head comfortably up her ass she proceeded to lose to a baboon.  Unfit for the fight, she lost the unloseable.  A poor candidate who seemed out of her depth against Trump.  Ridiculous and self entitled.  But it’s ok, all those movie stars have your back so how can you lose.

Trump is corrupt, a liar, delusional, a megalomaniac and thoroughly unfit.  Clinton was just old and thoroughly out of touch.  I imagine she still wakes some mornings and can’t understand how she lost.  When you don’t know your own country, that’s what happens.  Feed them cake indeed.  Maybe spend 5 minutes with people who earn less than 500K a year.  It’s all right, you can always wash the stench of the poor off you afterwards.

I wonder what the establishment has learnt from this.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The DNC is the problem and not Trump? Seriously dude?

Without wanting to defend the DNC, let's put things in perspective. The US political parties are much more democratic than most parties in western democracies, because they have ceded so much power to the voters. Let's not forget that a political party wants to keep as much control of their own affairs as possible. It used to be (and it's the case of most parties) that the party leaders decide who should be on the ticket and who can elect the next party leader. They were doing that until the 1970s (for the Dems) and 1980s (for the Repubs) when those parties opened up the selections process to the average voter.  Any voter can chose a party to participate in (in some states a voter can decide on same day of election) a party's selection process. No fees, no formal application, no admittance requirements. How many parties do you know that they do this???.

The super-delegates was an attempt by the Dems to keep some control.... the main objective of the party regulars & leaders is to win elections. Often the activist base is more radical (the more extreme elements of both parties participate in the primaries) and the may select candidates who are not suited for the general election.

As for the Sanders-Clinton race, the super delegates did NOT play a role. Nor have they played a role in that to reverse what the base has voted during the primary season. Clinton got millions more votes than Sanders. No serious analyst believes that the bias of the DNC in favor of Clinton helped her; actually it hurt her once people found out, so Sanders got a boost of contributions, publicity, and votes. Looking back, some people today say Sanders could have beaten Trump, but back then Clinton was thought as a stronger candidate for the general election. I'm still not convinced Sanders would have fared better, because socialism is not yet as acceptable in the US. And, the majority of the Dem party was not behind him, not in the primaries, among the Dem voters who participated in the selection process,  and not among the larger voter base that tends to vote Democratic in the general election.

Mind you, I voted for Sanders...

Edited by Hudson
  • Like it 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hudson, you’re not getting it.  My point is that America has a massive (and I mean MASSIVE) social divide.  The quality of life for a lot of people that voted for Trump, their general level of education, their income and outlook on life is limited.

If you repeated what you just said (and I do understand it and appreciate it) what they just heard is blah blah, blah blah, blah blah blah blah.

You have Hillary who offers them nothing, big fat ZEROES.  Then you get Ouga Bouga saying ME STRONG, ME MAKE YOUR LIFE BETTER, ME FIX AMERICA while he beats his chest.  Hillary laughed, the media laughed, the establishment laughed ... we laughed.  And Ouga Bouga won.

Why did she offer them nothing ?  That I will never know.  I can only assume because she (and the DP) thought surely they couldn’t lose.

Hillary should’ve prepared better and been wiser and read the lay of the land instead of assuming she couldn’t lose.  Her haughtiness gave government to Ouga Bouga.  I dare say he can read the lay of the land better than her.  Give the superficial masses the garbage they want to hear.  As for the DP, they are no party at all, for if they were, Sanders would’ve been the candidate.  But Hillary couldn’t have that now could she.

Again, what has the establishment learned from this ?  The next election will be interesting.  We will see if this was a one off or if a pattern is emerging.

Edited by Bananas
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine that the DP will fight fire with fire: Oprah Winfrey for president!!!! And our lives will be transformed into a Salvadore Dali painting....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oprah couldn’t win.  No one could win.  Trump is kryptonite to them Dems.  Makes their brains go crazy.

#whatisthepoint

Edited by Bananas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My opening post (it asserted that the DNC was the midwife that brought Trumpism to the USA and Trump to the White House) received criticisms. The criticisms are listed in red (below), and after each criticism I added, in black, the reasons for which I continue to believe that theTrumpian teratogenesis was midwifed by the Democratic party and the DNC.

The DNC is the problem and not Trump? Seriously dude?

Should I assume that my post was so robustly logical that you decided that I must be male? or did you find it so illogical

that you decided that I am male?

Without wanting to defend the DNC, let's put things in perspective. The US political parties are much more democratic than most parties in western democracies

I knew a fellow who was upset because he was cuckolded; no one stopped to inform him that many men were cuckolded more often than he and, therefore, he should consider himself blessed.

a political party wants to keep as much control of their own affairs as possible

A mafia padrino, e.g. Sam Giancana, controls his domain. But he does not insult his victims' intelligence by asking their opinion

The super-delegates was an attempt by the Dems to keep some control....

Exactly. The insiders treat the voters as infants.

As for the Sanders-Clinton race, the super delegates did NOT play a role

So what? Once, during a poker game, a player had a winning hand; four aces. Unfortunately, he was so exited that when he tried to collect the money, another foursome of aces came out his cuff. Although he had the the winning hand, his intent to fool the other players nullified his hand. He did receive something, but it was not money.

Mind you, I voted for Sanders...

So what? One of the reasons that the plebe does not cotton to the Democrats and the well-off (I believe) is the tendency of the Democrats to talk to the plebe in such a way that the plebe hears the following message:

I am smarter than you, better educated than you, better paid than you and morally perfect, unlike you. Be smart for the first time in your life and do as you're told.

Nowadays, almost everyone goes around stating that Trump is a clown and should not be the president. This, I believe, and not only is an instance of political masturbation. Reasonable people are asking which errors resulted in the teratogenesis. Crazy people believe that the same strategy in the same environment is likely to produce different results.


 

  • Like it 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bashibozuk said:

 

Without wanting to defend the DNC, let's put things in perspective. The US political parties are much more democratic than most parties in western democracies

I knew a fellow who was upset because he was cuckolded; no one stopped to inform him that many men were cuckolded more often than he and, therefore, he should consider himself blessed.

 


 

so ...if they are defined as blessed, then what are the keratades that have not been cuckolded?

 

is less more or is more less? what is the absolute 0?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, AchillesHeel said:

^^^^So you believe Trump was a result of errors and not an orchestrated sequence of events that were ridiculously obvious in attaining an end?

What orchestration man ?  Did Russia brainwash 300 million Americans ?  Let’s not get into that because it’s missing the point.

There are too many crying moral outrage at Trump when in reality he’s only done what politicians have done since time immemorial.  The only difference is he’s sunk to new lows.  So should we now feel sorry for Hillary because she couldn’t deal with the dirty fight ?

Trump did not have the backing of his party (crazy I know).  He did not have the backing of the media or celebrities.  He had less money also.  And yet he won.  He is supremely corrupt and without any semblance of good human virtues.  A pig of man, a swine for sure.  But as a politician, he was much better than Hillary.  He ran a better race.  Why is that so hard to understand ?

The saddest part of all of this, at least to me, is that the DP are feeling sorry for themselves, or outrage at Trump, when they should be angry at themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....  what are the keratades that have not been cuckolded?

I assume that you know that the word κερατάς does not  necessarily mean cuckolded.  If so, I wonder how many understood the ambiguity of your comment

Edited by Bashibozuk
not edited

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Bananas said:

What orchestration man ?  Did Russia brainwash 300 million Americans ?  Let’s not get into that because it’s missing the point.

There are too many crying moral outrage at Trump when in reality he’s only done what politicians have done since time immemorial.  The only difference is he’s sunk to new lows.  So should we now feel sorry for Hillary because she couldn’t deal with the dirty fight ?

Trump did not have the backing of his party (crazy I know).  He did not have the backing of the media or celebrities.  He had less money also.  And yet he won.  He is supremely corrupt and without any semblance of good human virtues.  A pig of man, a swine for sure.  But as a politician, he was much better than Hillary.  He ran a better race.  Why is that so hard to understand ?

The saddest part of all of this, at least to me, is that the DP are feeling sorry for themselves, or outrage at Trump, when they should be angry at themselves.

I don't believe any foreign influence played a major part in the election....only that in a world full of monopolies and privatization the role of "president of the United States of America" the match ups of candidates are not left to chance....little Hillary stood no chance running for the post from the get-go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Little Hillary never stood a chance.  I’m actually not sure if you’re being satirical or not. If you are being sincere, then I apologise.

As to Little Hillary, I can’t believe she was the underdog.  She had all the advantages she could’ve asked for.

I think she simply, along with the establishment, and the media, and us, misread the mood of a large portion of the country.  This is the point I keep trying to drive home i.e. that she and the DP made a huge error by not seeing this.  I can excuse the media because they are so partisan they can’t see straight.  I can excuse us, because hey we have lives and don’t have the time to see this.  But the DP and Hillary, what is their excuse for not seeing the danger ?  And you know what I believe ?  That it was pure 100% unadulterated hubris.  Surely he can’t win ... surely people will see he’s an imbecile.  Not good enough ... and now Dr. Stranglelove has the nuclear launch codes.

It’s been a ride I gotta say.  The gift that just keeps on giving.  Just this week with the anonymous op-ed, damn that was some good reading.  Side note, I’m actually really interested to see what the next election result will be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Oprah comment was satire....not my belief that Hillary was destined to fail against Trump from the moment the DP went with her.

20 minutes ago, Bananas said:

I think she simply, along with the establishment, and the media, and us, misread the mood of a large portion of the country.  This is the point I keep trying to drive home i.e. that she and the DP made a huge error by not seeing this.  I can excuse the media because they are so partisan they can’t see straight.  I can excuse us, because hey we have lives and don’t have the time to see this.  But the DP and Hillary, what is their excuse for not seeing the danger ?  And you know what I believe ?  That it was pure 100% unadulterated hubris.  Surely he can’t win ... surely people will see he’s an imbecile.  Not good enough ... and now Dr. Stranglelove has the nuclear launch codes.

I can understand your point of view that it was a gross error....but if you take a step back and look at all the sequences of all the events that put Trump in office my personal opinion is that it was no error....no conspiracy theories, russian meddling, etc. A simple manipulation of the "democratic" process where you have a candidate who is willing to pass certain policies and ideals so you place an opponent who is discredited and detached from the general population to guarantee victory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bashibozuk said:

....  what are the keratades that have not been cuckolded?

I assume that you know that the word κερατάς does not  necessarily mean cuckolded.  If so, I wonder how many understood the ambiguity of your comment

lol.   There is light. There is dark. And the shade of grey in between. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/8/2018 at 4:53 PM, Bashibozuk said:

My impression is that Trump is not the problem. The doctor Frankenstein that created him is.

WTF are you talking about? Is it not the Republican party that gave birth to a candidate the likes of Trump? Is it not the Republican party  that experimented with aborted creations the likes of Sara Palin and the Tea Party?

It's either the Republican party failed to stop Trump in his tracks or is complicit in giving birth to this monster. Either way they bear the entire responsibility for the arrival of this xenophobic larval stage of a yam that responds to the name of Trump.

The Republican party is responsible for propping up Trump, defending him against possible legal and ethical inquiries. 

7 hours ago, Bananas said:

What orchestration man ?  Did Russia brainwash 300 million Americans ?  Let’s not get into that because it’s missing the point.

Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes, Wisconsin by 22,748, Pennsylvania by 44,292. It's amazing what a 'little' Russian propaganda can accomplish if it targets the right people and places. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by more than 2.9 million votes. 

One can safely say that Hillary Clinton lost the election. The Republican party and their flag bearer won the 2016 election. Let's see what history ends up saying about this.

The Republican party gave us Rosemary's baby. Sorry to say, your Dr. Frankenstein wasn't a part of the 2016 thriller of a movie.

Somehow this feels like deja vu. Been here, done this before. Or was it last night in my neighborhood bar?

Edited by Pepito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Bananas said:

But the DP and Hillary, what is their excuse for not seeing the danger ?

It's called Republic Party, US Senate and Mitch McConnell (aka the Turtle). Need to keep up with timeline of events?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, AchillesHeel said:

A simple manipulation of the "democratic" process where you have a candidate who is willing to pass certain policies and ideals so you place an opponent who is discredited and detached from the general population to guarantee victory.

Oh boy! You really think the dumbF***s have a brain?  Trump's base is what? About 27% or Republicans? The rest of the Republicans that voted for Trump were hoping that the checks and balances of the US  democratic institutions would keep him at bay. Now that we see him slowly tearing apart the fabrics of American democracy, do you think Republicans will have enough votes stay in power?

I don't think so. Baring some newly started war or Russian hacking (with the blessings of the Republican party) this November should be the end of the line for Trump and Republicans. If Democrats win, they'll have a big mess to clean up. (A scathing attack by a veteran Republican congressional staffer)

And then we can safely say: Look what's happened to Rosemary's Baby.

 

Edited by Pepito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi pepito ... welcome aboard... the board

 

nice to see your beans and siesta point of view ... you forgot the salsa, cerveza and chihuahuas

 

how about that WALL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/10/2018 at 8:53 PM, Bashibozuk said:

The DNC is the problem and not Trump? Seriously dude?

Should I assume that my post was so robustly logical that you decided that I must be male? or did you find it so illogical

that you decided that I am male?

Without wanting to defend the DNC, let's put things in perspective. The US political parties are much more democratic than most parties in western democracies

I knew a fellow who was upset because he was cuckolded; no one stopped to inform him that many men were cuckolded more often than he and, therefore, he should consider himself blessed.

a political party wants to keep as much control of their own affairs as possible

A mafia padrino, e.g. Sam Giancana, controls his domain. But he does not insult his victims' intelligence by asking their opinion

The super-delegates was an attempt by the Dems to keep some control....

Exactly. The insiders treat the voters as infants.

As for the Sanders-Clinton race, the super delegates did NOT play a role

So what? Once, during a poker game, a player had a winning hand; four aces. Unfortunately, he was so exited that when he tried to collect the money, another foursome of aces came out his cuff. Although he had the the winning hand, his intent to fool the other players nullified his hand. He did receive something, but it was not money.

 


 

My apologies, madam. I assumed that a woman participating in this forum would be more logical and better at drawing analogies than some guy with a simplistic and irrational argument. 

Edited by Hudson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WTF are you talking about? Is it not the Republican party that …......

  1. When my paintings were stolen while the guards of my hacienda were playing poker, I was not angry with the thieves but I did fire the guards.

  2. When my best friend and my querida simultaneously caught gonorrhea, I was not angry with the bacteria; I just wished to their carriers a long and happy life away from me.

  3. A party that has the means to defeat a clown but chooses to waste its time and energy in endless omphaloscopy has no reason to exist.

  4. The Romans had a good way of handling such situations; decimation!

  5. Today we have become civilized (?); whoever does not know his profession loses his license

  6. If the mandarins of the DP had a scintilla of pride, they would have committed seppuku.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bashibozuk said:

When my best friend and my querida simultaneously caught gonorrhea, I was not angry with the bacteria; I just wished to their carriers a long and happy life away from me.

what if you were the carrier that caused both cases?

  • Like it 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh boy.....everyone is far too clever in this section.....except Pepito....he's all about them beans....we're all still waiting for the "end of the line"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/11/2018 at 10:54 PM, Bashibozuk said:

When my paintings were stolen while the guards of my hacienda were playing poker, I was not angry with the thieves but I did fire the guards.

Ha, ha! You're so funny! I really don't care what you do in your personal life, but if my mayor said "it's time to tackle home security services" instead of his usual "this is how we tackle crime" then we'd all vote to lock him up in the looney bin. 

Nobody harps on how Croatia was responsible for France winning the World Cup final. As is the norm, winners are responsible for winning. The losing team bears responsibility, only with their fans, of not being able to win the game. 

My point once again is: the Republican Party is responsible for this oozy lather of absurd hyperbole that goes by the name Trump. Any which way you slice or dice it. You can be cute all you want -- entertain people with your gonorrhea stories -- the Republican party, from US Congress to local government is responsible for bringing this fart-infused lump of raw meat to the White House.

Unless of course one voted for Trump and now has to make up some sort of excuse. Ahhh... Let's blame Hillary. Why not? Let's blame the Democrats. Why not? Things don't need to make sense. Just chant "lock her up" a couple of times and you'll get plenty of cranial bee sting victims joining in on the dance. 

Edited by Pepito
  • Like it 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Similar Content

    • By Lazarus
      Former President Barack Obama delivered a rousing eulogy celebrating Lewis' life. "He, as much as anyone in our history, brought this country a little bit closer to our highest ideals," Mr. Obama said.
      Consider it a lesson in leadership and human values. Topic is locked to keep out trolling (we'll deal with all the exotic trolls in these forums in the coming days).
       
       
    • By Lazarus
      A record number of Democrats are lining up and declaring themselves as Democratic candidates for the 2020 Presidential Elections in the USA.
      Pete Buttigieg caught my eye the other day in a town hall meeting televised on CNN. I thought he was a well spoken young man, with ideas and values that I agreed with. He needs 65, 000 donors to be invited to the Democrats debate. I would like to see him there, so I donated to his campaign.
         
    • By Lazarus
      This is from BBC:
      Vegan protests: 'Un-Australian' activists arrested, PM Morrison says
      Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has criticised animal rights activists as "shameful and un-Australian" after dozens were arrested in nationwide protests.
      While - I have to admit - I'm note sure where PM Scott Morrison stands on issues, It looks to me like taking out a page from the Orange Orangutan's (Donald Trump) book. Divide the country in an effort to conquer. Pitch one group of people against another and start creating a condition that is hostile to people sharing values. Probably now is a good time to break up labor unions also?
      It seems that everywhere one turns, it's a right wing full frontal attack to the voice of the people.
    • By Reaper
      Inexplicable decision
      Online government portal Diavgeia turned out to be one of the most important reforms carried out in Greece over the last few years. A decision by today?s leftist-led coalition government to dismantle the transparency initiative program was based on absolutely unfounded excuses and represents a major setback. The government portal allowed citizens to have access to decisions regarding state recruitments and procurements, the expenditure of public organizations and other interesting information.
      In the absence of Diavgeia, what is more than certain is that the corrupt and the wasteful will once more be able to hide behind a veil of nontransparency. The removal of the transparency portal was no doubt an incomprehensible decision on the part of the SYRIZA-Independent Greeks administration.
      http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite3_1_06/05/2015_549741
    • By Epicurus
      We had another mass shooting in the US, this time in Las Vegas, the deadliest of its kind, until the next one of course. Our right to be safe is trampled by the right for someone to own military-grade weapons.
      We had hoped that after the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, Congress would act to pass some federal gun safety laws. Nothing!  The victims' stories and pictures in Vegas are beginning to circulate now. I'll leave you with the images of the children of Sandy Hook as a horrific reminder that how a political party and its leaders are essentially in the pocket of the gun lobby.
    • By athinaios
      Friends,
      It's been a week since the US general election, and a new page in American politics has started. Let's put the other thread to rest, because it escalated into personal attacks, so let's respectfully discuss the new president's tenure and related matters here. 
      Let's remind ourselves that the point of this forum is to welcome a diversity of people and ideas, and to have a good time, even when we disagree with others; and, it'll be fun, because we'll be having a civilized discussion, right?...
      So, president-elect Trump....  We'll be watching but who can say what he'll actually do? How do you judge his first moves and statements?
       
    • By Tzatziki
      Pentagon Officials Allowed Workers to Use Government Credit Cards at Strip Clubs
       

       
      The initial 2015 audit discovered that workers spent nearly $100,000 at various strip clubs and related adult-oriented establishments, which kinda sounds like nothing when compared with the estimated $1 million spent at casinos. As for how exactly such charges are allowed to exist, the report's findings suggest that Defense Travel Management Office officials and DoD management did not properly explain how the travel cards should be used. Furthermore, DoD officials were not adequately trained on how to discipline those found to have misused the cards. For the complete rundown, read the full report right here.
  • Popular Topics Now

×
×
  • Create New...